First Snow : 6.9?
Re: 6.9?
Oh I couldn't agree more, I nearly fell asleep too, not just saying that, I really did. I still don't know why I wasted an hour & a half of my life watching this pile of rubbish.
Just how many shots where there looking out of a windscreen at empty bleak roads?
How many times were there huge parts with no dialogue & dreary music?
I've watched many movies in my time & this rates as one of the lowest if not the lowest. 1/10
Just how many shots where there looking out of a windscreen at empty bleak roads?
How many times were there huge parts with no dialogue & dreary music?
I've watched many movies in my time & this rates as one of the lowest if not the lowest. 1/10
Re: 6.9?
at last someone agrees, so many people were telling me how good the film is god it was so cheap and trashy
Re: 6.9?
welcome to the frightening land of
sounds like you're looking for the exit
sounds like you're looking for the exit
Re: 6.9?
nope, you're wrong.
This film has one of the best ending I ever saw. Probably, it's not a film for you.
8/10
This film has one of the best ending I ever saw. Probably, it's not a film for you.
8/10
Re: 6.9?
I thought it was pretty good , solid performances and all.
7,50/10
7,50/10
Re: 6.9?
Let's see you make something better than it.
LOSE means to come to be without, LOOSE means not bound together. Get it right.
LOSE means to come to be without, LOOSE means not bound together. Get it right.
Re: 6.9?
It was pretty classy, even if the ending wasn't so hot. I think 6.9 is about right. Maybe a little higher.
.
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!
.
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!
Re: 6.9?
I gave it a 10/10, excellent performance by Guy Pearce with a brilliantly poetic ending.
Other than Zodiac, it's my favorite film of the year.
Other than Zodiac, it's my favorite film of the year.
Re: 6.9?
god, what kinda retard are you? you're saying that you can't judge other people, for god's sake, are we not allowed to admit a movie is bad cos they were lucky enough to get the rights and money to create this peice of rubbish, GAL (get a life, man)
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: 6.9?
I seen this last night and gave it 6.
While Guy's perforamnce was top notch the story was all too predictable IMO.
While Guy's perforamnce was top notch the story was all too predictable IMO.
Re: 6.9?
Yes. I am serious.
My question is, are you serious? A three year old could've made that film?? so why don't you try and make one! Let's see how better you can do? why are you sitting here and making comment on this movie? huh?
I know what kind of movie you like. you like chickflick, bang, bang, bang & and everthing is finished, hero wins and lives happy everafter with his HOT girlfrind.
Oh, i know why you fell asleep. what did you do at night? are you a thief or nightguard?
and how did this film get 6.9? you won't understand. beacause you dont have got the organ that helps understand things. Go and see a doctor. see if you have got brains.
I rated this movie 9. I wanted to give it 10 but didn't do that because there's still some room for improvement.
And from next time try to watch some better movies.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
My question is, are you serious? A three year old could've made that film?? so why don't you try and make one! Let's see how better you can do? why are you sitting here and making comment on this movie? huh?
I know what kind of movie you like. you like chickflick, bang, bang, bang & and everthing is finished, hero wins and lives happy everafter with his HOT girlfrind.
Oh, i know why you fell asleep. what did you do at night? are you a thief or nightguard?
and how did this film get 6.9? you won't understand. beacause you dont have got the organ that helps understand things. Go and see a doctor. see if you have got brains.
I rated this movie 9. I wanted to give it 10 but didn't do that because there's still some room for improvement.
And from next time try to watch some better movies.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
If i say something is bad, it's my opinion, ok? This was a BAD film, I don't need any tips on how to live my life by you, i believe a three year old could've made "Eyes wide shut", "A river runs through it" and "Daddy day care", which i'm sure you won't agree with either It's thanks to people like you we're headed for a world like "1984", i'll be awaiting your next comment correcting me that it's actually 2007, which sounds like something you would do
Re: 6.9?
Huh, very knowledgeable. Who said you that my one's not my opinion?
Yeah, you do need tips. You are not getting it. But I am saying youyou do need this. Hey, why don't you ask others about your film critique expertise?
There' a reason why I am saying so. I am not saying that out of my opinion. I am saying that out of pure logic. You were saying that a 3 year old could've made this movie? So which year you are from2700, where a 3 year old can make a movie? Are you from the future so that you can call me I am from '84? So why don't you go else instead of this version of IMDb? You are in 2007, it is a recent movie and you comment like you are in 2700 and the movie seems boring to you. So why don't you wait another 693 years to make a comment on this movie? Then I will understand that yeah I am backdated now & I should quit. Now think what you've just said. Who should quit? Is it me or you?
Try to apply some reasoning while making a comment on something. Being in present you can't act like a person from the future. If you continuously do this, then I am sure you'll be in big trouble in your life;let alone at IMDb. It's nothing compared to life.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Yeah, you do need tips. You are not getting it. But I am saying youyou do need this. Hey, why don't you ask others about your film critique expertise?
There' a reason why I am saying so. I am not saying that out of my opinion. I am saying that out of pure logic. You were saying that a 3 year old could've made this movie? So which year you are from2700, where a 3 year old can make a movie? Are you from the future so that you can call me I am from '84? So why don't you go else instead of this version of IMDb? You are in 2007, it is a recent movie and you comment like you are in 2700 and the movie seems boring to you. So why don't you wait another 693 years to make a comment on this movie? Then I will understand that yeah I am backdated now & I should quit. Now think what you've just said. Who should quit? Is it me or you?
Try to apply some reasoning while making a comment on something. Being in present you can't act like a person from the future. If you continuously do this, then I am sure you'll be in big trouble in your life;let alone at IMDb. It's nothing compared to life.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
Oh my god, either you're foreign and really don't know english or you're just americanI quote "Who said you that my one's not my opinion?" god i rest my case
Re: 6.9?
That wasn't a mistake. Read it very carefully and you'll understand the meaning. But are you now anyhow suggesting that I don't know English? Is that what are you trying to say? OMG. You see, you even don't have respect for foreign people. Hey, which country are you fromBritain? Only they take that much of pride on their mother tongue. They think rest of the world doesn't know English.
Now let's move into the point. I am not here to create a classic literature. If you aren't being able to figure out the meaning then I should really feel sorry for your English knowledge. Are you grammar teacher at some kindergarten or what? Oh, I just remembered that you are from future where a 3 year old kid can make a full length movie. I beg your pardon for not remembering it early. You probably write English in a bit different way than usual.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Now let's move into the point. I am not here to create a classic literature. If you aren't being able to figure out the meaning then I should really feel sorry for your English knowledge. Are you grammar teacher at some kindergarten or what? Oh, I just remembered that you are from future where a 3 year old kid can make a full length movie. I beg your pardon for not remembering it early. You probably write English in a bit different way than usual.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
I'm sorry,there's no point talking to you, you don't SPEAK english and it's not that I don't RESPECT the rest of the world, but please, in the future, stick to your own bloody language
Re: 6.9?
Oh, you're saying that since I don't speak English, I can't comment on English movies. Is that are you trying to say? Are you out of your mind? If I don't know English then how can you understand what I say? or are you using a device from year 2700 to understand my English? Then I feel sorry for you. Because not all the members of IMDb aren't English speakers.
I know why are you not interested to talk with me. Because you don't have enough logic left to argue. Am I right? Then you should quit instead of looking for errors in my English. try to stick to the topic. You've started totally off topic discussion.
And you told me to stick to my own language! I bet you won't understand a single word of it. But I also know why you are saying so. Because then you'll show a better excuse for not understanding what I say.
The more I am talking with you the more I am getting frustrated about you. You don't even know simple courtesy. Please mind your language from next time coz your manners indicate what kind of family are you from.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
I know why are you not interested to talk with me. Because you don't have enough logic left to argue. Am I right? Then you should quit instead of looking for errors in my English. try to stick to the topic. You've started totally off topic discussion.
And you told me to stick to my own language! I bet you won't understand a single word of it. But I also know why you are saying so. Because then you'll show a better excuse for not understanding what I say.
The more I am talking with you the more I am getting frustrated about you. You don't even know simple courtesy. Please mind your language from next time coz your manners indicate what kind of family are you from.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
for god sake, i'm not arguing with you anymore because you lost the point aaaages ago, what the hell are you talking about? I never said ANYTHING about the year 2700, not one word, stupid, and out of interest, where ARE you from?
Re: 6.9?
Are you having a memory of goldfish? If so then check out the previous messages. Ok, I am making your life easier. You said, "It's thanks to people like you we're headed for a world like "1984", i'll be awaiting your next comment correcting me that it's actually 2007, which sounds like something you would do". You remember now, huh. Pathetic! This is the reason why I mentioned about year 2700. You are suggesting that I am backdated along with all other people who said this movie is good. So I thought you are someone from the future or someone pretending to be from future.
If you are not interested to argue then why are you trying to do so? You are not good at it. I am saying it to you again; you are simply not good at it. You are just daddy's whinning child. So quit arguing. Do whatever you good at. That'll be better for you. Do you understand what am I talking about? I hope you do.
And to meet your interest: I'm from BANGLADESH.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
If you are not interested to argue then why are you trying to do so? You are not good at it. I am saying it to you again; you are simply not good at it. You are just daddy's whinning child. So quit arguing. Do whatever you good at. That'll be better for you. Do you understand what am I talking about? I hope you do.
And to meet your interest: I'm from BANGLADESH.
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
no i don't understand, man, cos you're not speaking english and as for "1984", it's a novel by george orwell, you idiot, i wasn't talking about the year, i'm russian, 16 years old, and yes, i speak english any questions?
Re: 6.9?
If you don't speak clearly then who would understand what are you talking about. I'm not that much intelligent to go into your brain and find about Mr. Orwell. You had to mention it clearly.
You don't understand what I am talking about huh? Then how are you replying? Do you really believe what comes out of your mouth?
I'm not interested to know about who you are, how old are you or where are you from. So you didn't need to say that. And I don't have any question to ask from you.
And again mind your language. Didn't your parents teach you how to speak with people(even if you think they are idiots)?
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
You don't understand what I am talking about huh? Then how are you replying? Do you really believe what comes out of your mouth?
I'm not interested to know about who you are, how old are you or where are you from. So you didn't need to say that. And I don't have any question to ask from you.
And again mind your language. Didn't your parents teach you how to speak with people(even if you think they are idiots)?
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
ok anyone else have anything to say? possibly something that makes sense? and from someone who has a brain? it's lonely here without you
Re: 6.9?
Well it's nearly a year on so what the hell. The movie was awful, dull, slow & boring, I think that describes it perfectly.
lizzie2002 has the right idea imo & yasirfarabi is from another planet, I've never read anything so incoherent in a long time.
And why yasirfarabi, do you find the need to insult the girls family by saying,
"Please mind your language from next time coz your manners indicate what kind of family are you from."
I think this kind of insult on a young girl indicates what kind of family YOU are from.
lizzie2002 has the right idea imo & yasirfarabi is from another planet, I've never read anything so incoherent in a long time.
And why yasirfarabi, do you find the need to insult the girls family by saying,
"Please mind your language from next time coz your manners indicate what kind of family are you from."
I think this kind of insult on a young girl indicates what kind of family YOU are from.
Re: 6.9?
Hey - Thanks, dude ;)
"Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what's for lunch"
Re: 6.9?
oh! So you know she's a young girlright? But how dude? how do you even know she's a girl in the first place? makes me wonder
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=19153527
Re: 6.9?
I know this thread has been dead for awhile, but so is this board, so without further ado: the ratings of the threadstarter!:
Dr. Strangelove: 4
Ok, so you're a harsh critic. Not easily impressed. You must not give out a lot of easy positive scores.
Jack and Jill: 6
Ok, never mind that.
A Clockwork Orange: 5
So you aren't into the old ultraviolence. I get that. Not everyone can stomach the vile things that Alex does or has done to him in this film. It's a tough movie to watch if you haven't the constitution.
SAW: 10
Well, scratch that theory too. "They should have sent a poet." - you while watching SAW, apparently
Seven Samurai: 6
Well now you're just trying to be offensive.
Jungle 2 Jungle: 6
Yeah, sure. This is exactly as good as Seven Samurai.
The Room : 10
I'm afraid you don't know what numbers mean.
Dr. Strangelove: 4
Ok, so you're a harsh critic. Not easily impressed. You must not give out a lot of easy positive scores.
Jack and Jill: 6
Ok, never mind that.
A Clockwork Orange: 5
So you aren't into the old ultraviolence. I get that. Not everyone can stomach the vile things that Alex does or has done to him in this film. It's a tough movie to watch if you haven't the constitution.
SAW: 10
Well, scratch that theory too. "They should have sent a poet." - you while watching SAW, apparently
Seven Samurai: 6
Well now you're just trying to be offensive.
Jungle 2 Jungle: 6
Yeah, sure. This is exactly as good as Seven Samurai.
The Room : 10
I'm afraid you don't know what numbers mean.
Re: 6.9?
Definitely overrated. A very boring, uninteresting, forgettable film throughout, nothing special or remarkable about it.
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors)
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors)
Re: 6.9?
I thought it was good. I'd give it a 7.5.
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar, and / or doesn't.
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar, and / or doesn't.
6.9?
a three year old could've made this film!
It stank!
I almost fell asleep a couple of times,
how this film got 6.9 out of ten, i'll never understand