John Wick: Chapter 2 : Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

I thought Ruby Rose did a great job in Wick 2. Question: Could she take on the type of starring action roles that Angelina Jolie used to do? Lara Croft, for example.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

No telling, but she definitely has that sort of on-screen presence/it factor that makes you think 'Yeah, this is a person who belongs in the movies'

Even if she is just destined for sort of featured roles, stand-out supporting characters, villains, etc etc.and never really breaks out as a star in her own rightshe's going to find plenty of work.

I think she's been in 3 theatrically released films in the last month? XXX, Resident Evil, John Wick.

"Winners focus on winning. Losers focus on winners."

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

No, she is not good.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

No, she is horrible and hard to look at as well

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

I think this girl will get that with she can get bloody plus have a look you want to have sex with.She needs to be in JW3
http://i4.piimg.com/507682/5bf12243d3f7fc28.jpg

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

I like ruby but I don't think she's THAT great. She's hot, in a sense, and I liked her in orange is the new black, but idk.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

She will probably fade away and without many people even knowing who she is. She is in way too much stuff right now like eveey Hollywood action movie seems to cast her, maybe pick someone else no offense. Not really a fan at all

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Interesting comments. I used to think Gal Gadot was a bit weak and look where she is now. So what do I know?

Thanks for not accusing me of being Ruby Rose's agent, manager, publicist, relative, friend, lover, neighbor or hair stylist.

BTW, I'm going to miss these boards. Friendly and knowledgeable interactions usually.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Are you joking? She was really bad and her weak performance was the weak link in this amazing movie. They should have hired a real actress.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

No, not joking. Just giving my opinion, as you are.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Sure. I'm sure there are actresses and actors that I like and you don't like. That's a good thing. The world would be very boring if everyone had the same opinions all the time.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

She's the new tough, vaguely latina, kinda lesbionic token chic in commercial movies.

Think Michelle Rogriguez 15 years ago where she was in every movie playing the same character

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

That's a fairly good analogyalthough I get far less of a Latina vibe from her than Michelle Rodriguez, who always came off as rather overtly Latina

"Winners focus on winning. Losers focus on winners."

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

She is lesser than Michelle though. And Michelle I think fit a certain stereotype very hard, and wasn't a bad actress for what she did.

Ruby has less of a tough-girl presence, more of a unique attractive visual flair, but less personality. She isn't as hard-cast stereotype either.

Michelle has more impact on a movie. You can feel her in it.

Ruby is more of just there. Visually appealing, sure, but just there.

Resident Evil 6, John Wick 2, xXx 2 I haven't seen her in xXX (and won't, because I never cared for the other two) but I have seen the other 2. She doesn't speak in this one (mute) and only has a few line sin RE6, which are nothing to brag about, before she disappears in that one.

I like her style, but it's way too early to tell if she'll hold on and become a real actress. She's definitely no Angelina. She is also very, very small. And she isn't Michelle either.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

HAHAHAH no way

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

She's definitely no Angelina Jolie.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?

Jolie is so overrated. Boney arms and legs. Early on she had a nice face and tets. But very quickly it became apparent that she was an annoying actress and not really all that good looking.

Ruby is better looking but not deserving of any huge stardom. Also overrated.

Re: Is Ruby Rose the new Angelina Jolie?


Jolie is so overrated. Boney arms and legs. Early on she had a nice face and tets. But very quickly it became apparent that she was an annoying actress and not really all that good looking.


She lost way too much weight in 2011 and got bottox too, the reason she got thin and then got bottox is related

When you get bottox you look like an inflated doll so, by losing weight we didn't notice much. Still bottox is garbage, i mean look at Bradd Pitt in 2017, he looks like an inflated doll. he got bottox because jolie told him to do it, then he divorced hahahaha
Top