La La Land : Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Can you imagine Seyfried playing Mia ? i think she would've been way better than E.Stone who doesn't really know more than one expression.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

And also doesn't sing very well. Amanda has a lovely voice.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

And yet she won the Golden Globe and is nominated for an Oscar. You are clueless

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Because winning and being nominated for anything these days is indicative of true talent. Who's the clueless one?

_
I swear to God I'm an atheist.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

No it's you. I'm sick of reading clueless individuals second guess casting decisions that were clearly spot on. You can't do much better than Emma Stone has objectively in this role. It's like saying the Cubs should have hired a different manager AFTER they won the World Series. You are cluelessTHAT speaks for itself.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

I can't wait to learn more from you about sports, goobs. Are you letting in new members? LOL

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

YES!

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Is everyone here high? Amanda Seyfried is a bad, BAD singer. No way in hell would any professional musical theatre company ever consider hiring her after hearing her sing.

who doesn't really know more than one expression.
Did we watch the same movie?

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

her voice is fine, but her acting sucked in les miserable. she is a terrible actress!

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

I disagree. It's vice versa for me. I really can't listen to her sing (at least in Les Mis), but she's a wonderful actress.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

fortunately, i only watched one film she was in and that was les miserable, she played a small role in it. i just though she almost ruin the whole film. i skip all films she cast in after les miserable

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

So, you didn't see her in Mamma Mia where she sang on no less than 10 songs. Keep sharing your stellar opinions. LOL

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

no and will not give her another chance

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

OK, but will you continue to share incomplete opinions? If not, no loss. LOL

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Amanda is a trained singer actually and she's only in two of the most successful movie musicals of all time,before talking crap try not to sound like an idiot,Amanda's voice is so amazing Seth decided to let her sing in "Ted 2".

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

The only idiots around here are the ones who think Amanda Seyfried is some great vocalist.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

no, she was awful in les miserable. if she cast in mia, i wont watch lll

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Emma Stone has one expression? LOL, joke of the day is here!

You clearly haven't seen the movie yet but if you have, you weren't paying attention enough. This is her best performance so far in the industry, don't you see how she plays with her eyes around this time???

Amanda Seyfried, nope, she wouldn't have a great chemistry with Ryan Gosling. Sorry for you to hear this but I don't like her face too. She's the girl who I feel so bad cause her nose is painted red all the time, like she sneezes all day long. Not just that, I found her not to be attractive, maybe a little like Letters to Juliet was okay.

Not hating, but stating my opinion.

Yeah, I have seen some of Emma Stone's movies, a few of them would be Easy A, The Amazing Spider-Man 1 and 2, Crazy Stupid Love, Movie 43, a cameo in iCarly, Friends With Benefits, The House Bunny, Ghosts Of Girlfriends Past and Zombieland.

I'm seeing Birdman, Paper Man, Gangster Squad and The Help soon.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

I don't mind Stone as an actress, but Amanda is a better singer for sure.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Amanda Seyfried, though much better known for acting, actually has had training for a singer and had quite a number of songs recorded. She sang in musicals before, notably in Mama Mia but also in Les Misrables.

I wouldn't compare the two, but if Amanda were cast in this film, that would surely be better than her playing the main character in Lovelace - definitely the wrong height, size and body shape for a porn actress.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.


definitely the wrong height, size and body shape for a porn actress


What's wrong with Amanda's size, height and shape?

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Nothing wrong, except not the typical look of a porn actress. The real Linda Lovelace was half a ft. taller than Amanda and was of the "heavy type", like weighing 50 pounds more.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Emma Stone was the right choice.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

AMEN..as evidenced by awards, ticket sales and common sense.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

Awards are irrelevant in this corrupt industy and ticket sales or not,Amanda would've been better why ? because she sings and acts better and has been in better romantic films.

Re: Amanda Seyfried would've been better.

I'm glad Emma got the role.
Top