Ghostbusters : IMDB are cowards…..

You insisted that you were here to discuss movies FIRST. And still no discussion about the movie

---

due to their thin skin.

---

There you go again shaming people for their body. You say you're not a troll but you keep on proving that you are.

RIP IMDb.

---

due to their thin skin.

---

There you go again shaming people for their body. You say you're not a troll but you keep on proving that you are.

RIP IMDb.

Use google to look up thin skinned, Philip and you'll understand why I'm laughing at you.

Hear me now! This place is cursed, damned, and yes your master is the devil!

He's not one of the people you're talking about in your OP. He's one of the trolls who chased anyone off this board who didn't hate the movie. This is kinda what I mean about discussion being confusing to impossible on these boards. ;)

Mr. 38 years old, thin people just means people with a normal-sized body, that is all there is to it. Keep on being immature, it's what you're good at.

RIP IMDb.

No, it means people get offended way too easily, like you and the other person.

Hear me now! This place is cursed, damned, and yes your master is the devil!

Oi, he's not offended, he is playing you. Don't take it so seriously.

You might want to spend your time finding a new board, Philip.

LOL!

Hear me now! This place is cursed, damned, and yes your master is the devil!

---

There you go again shaming people for their body

---

Philip that joke is wearing a bit.. thin.

You are absolutely right! They are HUGE cowards!

Or they just don't want to empower immature, child like behavior of people who throw out name calling and can't discuss things rationally without going on hot headed tirades with name calling

---

Or they just don't want to empower immature, child like behavior of people who throw out name calling

---

Couldn't calling another person "immature" and "child like" be considered name calling?

---

The thin-skinned ones I see are the ones who consistently flock to message boards for movies and people they claim to "despise" and then try to force the point of view that people can only be respected and liked if they hate the same things they hate.

---

Sounds like Paul Feig's marketing strategy for Ghostbusters - Answer the Call, by calling anyone who did not like his movie a "misogynist", thereby bullying them into somehow approving of his film.

Are you gonna keep playing the "I was victimized" first card for the rest of your natural born life or are you ever gonna admit that's just an act you use to appear "justifiably victimized" to the feeble minded?

Because I can assure you I can go to any news story about the remake with reader comments prior to his or Melissa McCarthy or Leslie Jones' comments about "the poor fans" and point out that people like you had your knives sharpened for the slaughter LONG before he opened his mouth, something I brought up in my earlier statement that you just "conveniently" left out of your response. Perhaps that could be because you know it's the truth and the longer you can keep that fact out of the discussion, the longer you can appear "justified?"

That's why I have no sympathy for anything you or Natalia say. You're victims of your own making.

There's a difference between a differing opinion and a forced one.

---

and point out that people like you had your knives sharpened for the slaughter LONG before he opened his mouth

---

As always Pattyboi, you've proven that reading is too difficult for you to comprehend.

Paul Feig waved it in everyone's face first, and then went out and attacked others. And even IF you want to pretend that he didn't you're "people like you" comment holds no weight since I never commented on his arrogance in rebooting the film this way until he called the entire fanbase *beep* and "misogynists".

---

That's why I have no sympathy for anything you or Natalia say.

---

You don't have sympathy for anyone, and it's why you're alone and will always be alone.

You're the type who cannot make up his own mind, so he has to side with the group who he thinks will favor and value his opinions. When the fact remains, you have nothing of value to contribute.

Just the other day, you tried to justify your worth by boasting about a minor in cimena that you hold, so right there, you're demanding that people accept your opinion as some type of fact when all you've done is demonstrate that you just need attention. And that is why you're alone.

Except he didn't. You can try to distort facts to suit your agenda, but unfortunately, the Internet doesn't easily forget:

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Paul-Feig-Just-Went-Off-Some-Ghostbusters-Haters-84417.html

With the first tweet dated back to September 2015, when all that was released was nothing more than the cast and a still photo of said cast in costume. Less than a year after Feig was announced as director and less than a year after your girl started making the rounds, verbally demeaning him and the existence of this film. So yeah. "You" may have held your tongue, but the people you defend sure didn't.

Also, I could write an entire dissertation on how cute that is that you think I'm "alone and will always be alone," but unfortunately for you, I have a deadline on two articles to be done in the next two days and a copy of "The Edge of Seventeen" to get my boyfriend (of four years and also thinks you and Natalia are the epitome of pathetic; we were actually laughing at both of you last week when I told him about one of the articles that'll be "dedicated" to the both of you) for Valentine's, so on that note, I'll bid you "adieu". But not before I save this since I'm sure someone will try to get this deleted while I'm out.

There's a difference between a differing opinion and a forced one.

---

Except he didn't. You can try to distort facts to suit your agenda, but unfortunately, the Internet doesn't easily forget:

---

You mean that promo pic that Paul released of the main cast and 30 other women all holding up a sign that said "Girl Power"? Yeah, that was in no way snubbing the fans or alienating the audience.

---

With the first tweet dated back to September 2015, when all that was released was nothing more than the cast and a still photo of said cast in costume.

---

Paul released this picture in August of 2015 Pattyboi!
http://www.slashfilm.com/ghostbusters-reboot-girl-power/

You're claiming that the hate started in September 2015, Paul started the problem in August of 2015.

Nice try at spin, but as usual, you failed miserably and the FACTS prove you wrong on this one!

---

to get my boyfriend

---

Hopefully you stay that way, it at least makes sure you never reproduce and raise children in your pathetic "I'm a worthless, contradicting *beep* but i act like i'm intelligent, educated and above everybody else with an ego the size of Canada" image.
Thanks for that, fag

Sounds like someone didn't get off the bitter train when they had the chance to. I guess being bi in Germany isn't as sexy as it sounds. But then again, what's sexy about being an identity on the sexuality spectrum that's constantly mocked as one of selfishness (bis are greedy and can't make up their mind on who they want to settle down with) or lies (bis are really gay, but lack the backbone to admit who they really are). And if you're a woman, you're really screwed. Just ask Amber Heard.

And don't worry. The size of our eventual family will be plenty big and exude more intelligence and confidence just from knuckle cracking than you've demonstrated in nearly a year of our "acquaintance". They'll also be clever with how they insult their "enemies" and won't just call people "retards". But I digress, switch-hitter.

There's a difference between a differing opinion and a forced one.

I see you're getting more of my comments around here deleted. And you call me "triggered" and "thin-skinned".

There's a difference between a differing opinion and a forced one.

Why would I be replying to you if I was deleting your comments? How am I supposed to write back?

Wow you're a TRIGGERED paranoid one

Except they weren't "deleted by an administrator" when you responded to them and just so happened to be deleted after the fact.

As for the "why would you," it's simple: instead of being someone who you can easily write off and make fun of, I'm actually more of a challenge because I can hold my own in our little "sparring sessions" and there's clearly something in my writings to scrape at your bones, not to mention that I will always know a little more than you ever will about films because my knowledge expands beyond simple "fan culture".

Also, you keep saying "triggered" like it's going to cause me to have a Mrs. H moment (if you can get that reference, I will actually be impressed). Just like your equally challenged acolytes, you really need to get a better act. It's gotten Douglas Sirk melodramatic, even for you.

There's a difference between a differing opinion and a forced one.

---

Except they weren't "deleted by an administrator" when you responded to them and just so happened to be deleted after the fact.

---

A bunch of lies, and you know it. In this thread I even asked Phil about one of the posts you were whining about:
http://www.imdb.com/board/11289401/board/nest/265981176

Why is it that everything about you is laced with failure? Oh, right. Because you're so very TRIGGERED about everything to actually do anything