Economics, Business, Money, Finance : $1 = $150,000?
Re: $1 = $150,000?
So an error done on purpose.
Six point four times $150,000 = mucho buckaroos.
They're not stupid: they simply count on collector's stupidity.
Collector is a mental disease and an addiction like any other.
My password is password
Six point four times $150,000 = mucho buckaroos.
They're not stupid: they simply count on collector's stupidity.
Collector is a mental disease and an addiction like any other.
My password is password
Re: $1 = $150,000?
Sure, but you can't win if you don't play. 
My password is password
My password is password
Re: $1 = $150,000?
At six point four million of them, they're not rare so IDK how it's considered collectors' material but ok. There's more supply than there will be demand. Numismatists are rather rare: too expensive a hobby.
My password is password
My password is password
Re: $1 = $150,000?!…
https://realdaily.com/bill-worth-150000 < You ONLY NEED this part of the URL. 
"THAT'S SOME BAD SHIT, HARRY!".
"THAT'S SOME BAD SHIT, HARRY!".
Re: $1 = $150,000?!…
His URL is now a collectors item.
My password is password
My password is password
Re: $1 = $150,000?
I not very smart, but I guess if you have the pair it worth more than $300,000.
I are The Antipop. I missing you, pop-actor©!
Re: $1 = $150,000?
A guy I know told me about these recently and how he's always keeping an eye out for them, but I don't remember all the details.
The story does fall apart under closer scrutiny, though.
If the bills were printed independently and the error wasn't noticed until after they hit circulation, it makes zero sense that they were marked with an * in advance. If they already had them printed up and hadn't already circulated them, then it would be conceivable they could have marked them in this manner before entering circulation, but that's not how the story is presented.
Clearly, some kind of bullshit is happening here. Either this was done on purpose, or they were corrected with the * before they were released. No other explanation makes sense.
The story does fall apart under closer scrutiny, though.
If the bills were printed independently and the error wasn't noticed until after they hit circulation, it makes zero sense that they were marked with an * in advance. If they already had them printed up and hadn't already circulated them, then it would be conceivable they could have marked them in this manner before entering circulation, but that's not how the story is presented.
Clearly, some kind of bullshit is happening here. Either this was done on purpose, or they were corrected with the * before they were released. No other explanation makes sense.
Re: $1 = $150,000?

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 🤨 Let's go, Brandon! 🤨 Try that in a small town.
$1 = $150,000?
https://realdaily.com/bill-worth-150000/?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=RD230217