Glover wasn't an ideal name to carry the film as marquee value.
People went to see it, but not in the same droves as the first and not as many as they would have anticipated. It bombed due to its higher budget and some sequels do make better returns than the original. Even with a lower budget, it would have still failed, because it didn't have a mega action star in the lead.
Tell me why the film didn't live up to box office expectations of the first then?
I have no idea and I'm humble enough and intelligent enough to admit that.
You are not humble enough to admit Glover was part of the main reason why it didn't live up to box office expectations.
Think about it; why would I "admit" to your speculative opinion?
Because you can't acknowledge the truth, even if based on a subjective opinion that as far as I'm concerned is pretty much spot on.
Do you think its not virtuous enough to claim Glover was part of the reason for the less than stellar box office results?
Speculative opinion is not truth.
You're still trying to put opinions in my mouth. Dumbass.
Speculative opinion does not provide fact, but it opens the door to truth.
Well express your opinions with more lucidity and insight than you are currently displaying, so I can know why you take umbrage to Glover's casting in this film being called out.
I don't believe
What is your speculation? I'm still waiting…..
Enjoy your wait. As I told you, I'm humble enough and intelligent enough that I have no desire to play your speculation game.
As I thought, not much you can offer, beyond my superior and fine tuned insight.
I'm still trying to ascertain what your opinion is
how dare someone make a valid point
Quit while you're NOT ahead….
I'm not whining, I'm mocking you.
Thanks for the bump, btw.
you keep responding to make some lame ass point
Glover's casting didn't strike the jackpot in Predator 2….
How many faceplants can you do?
What a fizzer Glover made of Predator 2 at the box office. Not his fault, but he was miscast as a LEAD to carry the film to glory fanboy.