◄ Message Boards : General Discussion

Star Wars: Episode VIII - The Last Jedi : Classic Name, But…

Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 08:39 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
Anybody else wish they had stuck to the 4 word sequel formula?

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
weslar
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 08:42 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since April 2011
yes. Last of the Jedi

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 08:47 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
Perfect, now somebody call Rian Johnson and tell him.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
darlingmagic
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 09:04 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since October 2011
Too similar to Return of the Jedi

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
SloppyJ30
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:33 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since July 2004
How does adding an unnecessary preposition and moving the definite article improve it?

-

I have meddled with the primal forces of nature and I will atone.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
weslar
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:34 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since April 2011
Makes it rhyme. Lucasfilm loves to rhyme

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
ryanpaul45
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 08:43 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since June 2011
A new hope, the phantom menace, the force awakens all 3 word titles

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
weslar
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 08:49 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since April 2011
1st in a trilogy yes. 2nd in the trilogy

The Empire Strikes Back, Attack of the Clones, . 4 word titles. Last of the Jedi

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
ryanpaul45
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:12 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since June 2011
Ohhh. Getchya. Hm. Maybe they wanted to change things. After all, TFA was way too much like a new hope

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
PiggybackBandit
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:14 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since September 2011
You're disappointed that the name of this movie doesn't have 4 words? I swear, people will complain about anything.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:16 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
Not a complaint, I like the name, but a standard was already set, why abandon it?

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
PiggybackBandit
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:20 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since September 2011
It wasn't a standard. They just happened to have 4 words in the title.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:21 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
lol that was not a coincidence, and Return of the Jedi/Revenge of the Sith, also not a coincidence

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
PiggybackBandit
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:23 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since September 2011
OK buddy

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
SloppyJ30
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:41 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since July 2004
Even if you're right, what's the purpose of making or keeping that as a "standard"? How is four words inherently better than three?? ME NO GET!!

These are the kinds of quibbles that earn fans the "man-children" label.

-

I have meddled with the primal forces of nature and I will atone.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:51 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
Like you said, you no get.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
maxLevelkook
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:17 AM) Reply | permalink
Member since May 2016
Maybe "Death of the Jedi" sounded too dark.

Re: Classic Name, But…

Jan_El_Senor avatar
by
Jan_El_Senor
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 10:25 AM) Send PM | Reply | permalink
Member since November 2005
I don't care.

Perpetual outrage is the most popular religion today.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Conan-1982
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 01:49 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since January 2015
Nah, it's no big deal.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Pentay
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 01:52 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since May 2005
It helps show that Disneyverse is separate canon from the original 6 and books/games.

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 02:07 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
except for that it's not

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Pentay
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 02:19 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since May 2005
GL sheep

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 09:04 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
no troll, I just know wtf I'm talking about

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Pentay
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 09:05 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since May 2005
Just because some ******* says, "Blurp, ah damn that's good soda. Oh and by the way folks *brushes neck beard* by the way Uh I work for Disney and all that stuff is no longer real to star wars."

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
jimmy-crain
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 04:13 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since August 2013
Phantom Menace?

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
AgentBlue
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 04:26 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since January 2010
Yeah I wish it had four words just for the patterns sake.


Lose the Game!!!!!!!

Re: Classic Name, But…

by
Julian_Pope
» 7 years ago(January 23, 2017 09:05 PM) Reply | permalink
Member since December 2006
Thank you, some people get it, some don't.
▲ Top